False Claims Act Expertise
Thomas M. Greene recently testified before Congress on the False Claims Act, drawing on two decades of experience.
Types of Fraud
Many government programs have been subject to fraud, particularly in the health care and defense industries.
How to Choose an Attorney
What questions should you ask a False Claims Act attorney before making a decision?

District of Columbia False Claims Act

Whistleblowers with knowledge of fraud on District of Columbia funds may bring suit on the District’s behalf and share in the recovery, under the D.C. False Claims Act which was first enacted in 1986.  Under D.C. Code § 2-381.02 of the Act, an individual may face civil liability for knowingly presenting or causing to be presented a false or fraudulent claim, conspiring to do so, or engaging in other fraudulent activity specified by law.

The D.C. False Claims Act is modeled on the federal False Claims Act, and cases brought under one statute are often brought in conjunction with claims under the other.  Violation of the D.C. False Claims Act exposes an individual for civil penalties up to three times the total damages to the state.  Further, the Act imposes civil penalties ranging between $5,000 – $10,000 for each individual false claim in violation of the Act.

A private individual with direct knowledge of a D.C. False Claims Act violation is authorized to file a suit under the Act’s qui tam provisions.  The qui tam relator, often referred to as a “whistleblower,” may proceed with the action regardless of whether the government chooses to intervene.

Whistleblowers involved in successful judgments or settlements may receive up to 20 percent of the civil penalties recovered by the state government.  If the state government has chosen not to intervene, the whistleblower may receive up to 40 percent of the available recovery. Further, the Act provides the whistleblower with protection against employer retaliation, offering reinstatement, double back pay with interest, and compensation for any special damages including attorneys’ fees if the employee disclosed information to the government in furtherance of an action under the D.C. False Claims Act, including investigation of the violation or testimony or assistance in the action.

Persons with information about fraud on the District of Columbia are urged to preserve their rights by consulting an attorney and filing a case as soon as possible.  A disclosure to the D.C. government pursuant to D.C. Code § 2-308.15(c)(2)(B) may preserve a person’s rights as an original source of the information about fraud.

As of July 2013, the text of the state FCA statute below is believed to be a complete, current version of the statute currently in force. Nonetheless, attorneys and qui tam relators should rely on the most up to date version of the state’s laws.

D.C. False Claims Act

§ 2-308.14. False claims liability, treble damages, costs, and civil penalties;
exceptions.

(a) Any person who commits any of the following acts shall be liable to the District for 3
times the amount of damages which the District sustains because of the act of that person.
A person who commits any of the following acts shall also be liable to the District for the
costs of a civil action brought to recover penalties or damages, and may be liable to the
District for a civil penalty of not less than $5,000, and not more than $10,000, for each
false claim for which the person:
(1) Knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the District
a false claim for payment or approval;
(2) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to
get a false claim paid or approved by the District;
(3) Conspires to defraud the District by getting a false claim allowed or paid by the District;
(4) Has possession, custody, or control of public property or money used, or to be used, by
the District and knowingly delivers, or causes to be delivered, less property than the
amount for which the person receives a certificate or receipt;
(5) Is authorized to make or deliver a document certifying receipt of property used, or to be
used, by the District and knowingly makes or delivers a document that falsely represents
the property used or to be used;
(6) Knowingly buys, or receives as a pledge of an obligation or debt, public property from
any person who lawfully may not sell or pledge the property;
(7) Knowingly makes or uses, or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to
conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the
District;
(8) Is a beneficiary of an inadvertent submission of a false claim to the District,
subsequently discovers the falsity of the claim, and fails to disclose the false claim to the
District; or
(9) Is the beneficiary of an inadvertent payment or overpayment by the District of monies
not due and knowingly fails to repay the inadvertent payment or overpayment to the
District.
(b) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the court may assess not more than two
times the amount of damages which the District sustains because of the act of the person,
and there shall be no civil penalty, if the court finds all of the following:
(1) The person committing the violation furnished officials of the District responsible for
investigating false claims violations with all information known to that person about the
violation within 30 days after the date on which the person first obtained the information;
(2) The person fully cooperated with any investigation by the District; and
(3) At the time the person furnished the District with information about the violation, no
criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative action had commenced with respect to
the violation, and the person did not have actual knowledge of the existence of an
investigation into the violation.
(c) Liability pursuant to this section shall be joint and several for any act committed by 2 or
more persons.
(d) This section shall not apply to the following:
(1) Workers’ compensation claims filed pursuant to Chapter 3 of Title 36;
(2) Unemployment compensation claims filed pursuant to Chapter 1 of Title 46; and
(3) Claims, records, or statements made pursuant to those portions of Title 47 of the
District of Columbia Code that refer or relate to taxation. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Law 6-85, §
814, 32 DCR 7396, as added May 8, 1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687.)

§ 2-308.15. Corporation counsel investigations and prosecutions; powers of
prosecuting authority; civil actions by individuals as qui tam plaintiffs; jurisdiction
of courts.

(a) The Corporation Counsel shall investigate, with such assistance from other District
agencies as may be required, violations pursuant to § 1-1188.14 involving District funds. If
the Corporation Counsel finds that a person has violated or is violating the provisions of § 1-
1188.14, the Corporation Counsel may bring a civil action against that person in the
Superior Court of the District of Columbia.
(b)
(1) A person may bring a civil action for a violation of § 1-1188.14 for the person and either
for the District or in the name of the District. The person bringing the action shall be
referred to as the qui tam plaintiff. Once filed, the action brought by the qui tam plaintiff
may be dismissed only with the written consent of the court, taking into account the best
interest of the parties involved and the public disclosure purposes of this subpart. The
Corporation Counsel shall be served with the notice of proposed dismissal and shall have the
opportunity to be heard.
(2) A complaint filed by a qui tam plaintiff pursuant to this subsection shall be filed in the
Superior Court in camera and may remain under seal for up to 180 days, unless the seal is
extended by the court. No service shall be made on the defendant until after the complaint
is unsealed.
(3) On the same day as the complaint is filed pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection,
the qui tam plaintiff shall serve the Corporation Counsel by mail, return receipt requested,
with a copy of the complaint and a written disclosure of substantially all material evidence
and information the person possesses.
(4) Within 180 days after receiving a complaint alleging violations involving District funds,
the Corporation Counsel shall do either of the following:
(A) Notify the court that he or she intends to proceed with the action, in which case the seal
may be lifted unless, for good cause shown, the court continues the seal; or
(B) Notify the court that he or she declines to take over the action, in which case the seal
shall be lifted and the qui tam plaintiff shall have the right to conduct the action.
(5) Upon a showing of good cause, the Corporation Counsel may move the court for
extensions of the time during which the complaint remains under seal.
(6) When a qui tam plaintiff brings an action pursuant to this subsection, no other person
may bring an action pursuant to this section based on the facts underlying the pending
action.
(c)
(1) No person may bring an action pursuant to subsection (b) of this section against a
member of the Council of the District of Columbia (“Council”), a member of the District
judiciary, or an elected official in the executive branch of the District, if the action is based
on any official act occurring during his or her term of office.
(2)
(A) No person may bring an action pursuant to subsection (b) of this section based upon
allegations or transactions in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, investigation, or
report, or audit conducted by or at the request of the Council, the Auditor, the Inspector
General, or other District or federal agency; or upon allegations or transactions disclosed by
the news media, unless the person bringing the action is an original source of the
information.
(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, the term “original source” means
an individual who has direct and independent knowledge of the information on which the
allegations are based, who voluntarily provided the information to the District before filing
an action based on that information, and whose information provided the basis or catalyst
for the investigation, report, hearing, audit, or media disclosure which led to the public
disclosure as described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.
(3) No person may bring an action pursuant to subsection (b) of this section based upon
information learned by the person in the course of an internal investigation in preparation
for, or in conjunction with, a voluntary disclosure to the District or federal government.
(4) No present or former employee of the District, or any person who is acting on behalf of
or relying on information provided by that employee, may bring an action pursuant to
subsection (b) of this section if the employee discovered or obtained the information on
which the action is based during the course of his or her employment, unless that employee
first in good faith exhausted internal procedures for reporting and seeking recovery of such
falsely claimed sums through official channels, including notice to the Corporation Counsel,
and unless the District failed to act on the information provided within a reasonable time.
(5) No member or employee of the Council of the District of Columbia, the Corporation
Counsel’s Office, the Office of the Inspector General, the Office of the Auditor, the Office of
the Chief Financial Officer, or the Metropolitan Police Department may bring an action
pursuant to subsection (b) of this section based upon information discovered during the
term of his or her employment.
(6) No person may bring an action pursuant to this section if the person has been convicted
of a criminal offense in connection with any false claim that is the subject of the action.
(7) No person may sell or otherwise transfer any cause of action, or interest in any present
or future benefit provided, pursuant to this section.
(d)
(1) If the District proceeds with the action, it shall have the primary responsibility for
prosecuting the action. The qui tam plaintiff shall have the right to continue as a party to
the action and to participate in the action to the extent that the qui tam plaintiff is able to
demonstrate to the court that such participation would neither be duplicative of nor interfere
with the prosecution of the action by the Corporation Counsel; provided, that the qui tam
action was proper pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.
(2)
(A) The District may dismiss the action for good cause shown.
(B) The District may settle the action with the defendant, notwithstanding the objections of
the qui tam plaintiff, if the court determines, after a hearing providing the qui tam plaintiff
an opportunity to be heard, that the proposed settlement fairly, adequately, and reasonably
protects the interests of the District under all of the circumstances.
(e)
(1) If the District elects not to proceed and the qui tam action was proper pursuant to
subsection (c) of this section, the qui tam plaintiff shall have the same right to conduct the
action as the Corporation Counsel would have had if he or she had chosen to proceed
pursuant to subsection (b) of this section. If the District so requests, the District shall be
served with copies of all pleadings filed in the action.
(2) Upon timely application, the court shall permit the District to intervene in an action with
which it had initially declined to proceed. In the event that the District is permitted to
intervene, it shall have the primary responsibility for prosecuting the action as provided in
subsection (d)(1) of this section.
(f)
(1) If the District proceeds with an action brought by a qui tam plaintiff pursuant to
subsection (b) of this section, and the qui tam action was proper pursuant to subsection (c)
of this section, the qui tam plaintiff, subject to paragraphs (3) and (4) of this subsection,
shall receive at least 10%, but not more than 20%, of the proceeds of the judgment or
settlement of the claim, taking into account the significance of the information, the role of
the qui tam plaintiff in advancing the litigation, the qui tam plaintiff’s attempts to avoid or
resist such activity, and all other circumstances surrounding the activity, except, that if the
qui tam plaintiff was substantially involved in the fraudulent activity on which the action is
based, the court may direct that the plaintiff receive less than 10%. When the Corporation
Counsel conducts the action, 25% of the proceeds of the judgment or settlement of the
claim shall be paid into the Antifraud Fund established by § 1-1188.20.
(2) If the District does not proceed with the action, the court may award the qui tam
plaintiff those sums from the proceeds it considers appropriate, which shall be at least 25%
but not more than 40%, taking into account the significance of the information, the role of
the qui tam plaintiff in advancing the case to litigation, and the scope of, and response to,
the employee’s attempts to report and gain recovery of such falsely claimed funds through
official channels; provided, that if the qui tam plaintiff was substantially involved in the
fraudulent activity on which the action is based, the court may award the qui tam plaintiff
less than 25%.
(3) The portion of the recovery not distributed pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
subsection shall be paid to the District treasury.
(4) If the District or the qui tam plaintiff prevails in or settles any action pursuant to
subsection (c) of this section, the qui tam plaintiff shall receive an amount for reasonable
expenses which the court finds to have been necessarily incurred, plus reasonable costs and
attorneys fees. All expenses, costs, and fees shall be awarded against the defendant and
under no circumstances shall they be the responsibility of the District.
(5) If the District does not proceed with the action and the qui tam plaintiff conducts the
action, the court may award to the defendant reasonable attorneys fees and expenses
necessarily incurred if the defendant prevails in the action and the court finds that the claim
of the qui tam plaintiff was frivolous, vexatious, or brought solely for purposes of
harassment.
(g) In any action brought pursuant to this section, the court may stay discovery if the
Corporation Counsel or the United States Attorney’s Office shows that discovery would
interfere with an investigation or a prosecution of a criminal matter arising out of the same
facts, regardless of whether the Corporation Counsel or the United States Attorney’s Office
has pursued the criminal or civil investigation or proceedings with reasonable diligence, and
any proposed discovery in the civil action will interfere with the ongoing criminal or civil
investigation or proceedings. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Law 6-85, § 815, 32 DCR 7396, as added
May 8, 1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687; Apr. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-264, §
10(b), 46 DCR 2118.)

§ 2-308.16. Employer interference with employee disclosures; liability of
employer; remedies of employee.

(a) No employer, including the District of Columbia, shall make, adopt, or enforce any rule,
regulation, or policy preventing an employee from disclosing information to a government or
law enforcement agency concerning, or from acting in furtherance of, a false claims action,
including investigating, initiating, testifying, or assisting in an action filed or to be filed
pursuant to § 1- 1188.15.
(b) No employer, including the District of Columbia, shall discharge, demote, suspend,
threaten, harass, deny promotion to, or in any other manner discriminate against an
employee in the terms and conditions of employment because of lawful acts done by the
employee on behalf of the employee or others in disclosing information to a government or
law enforcement agency relating to, or in furtherance of, a false claims action, including
investigation of, initiation of, or testimony or assistance in, an action filed or to be filed
pursuant to § 2-308.15.
(c) Any employer, including the District of Columbia, who violates subsection (b) of this
section shall be liable for the relief necessary to make the employee whole, including
reinstatement with the same seniority status that the employee would have had but for the
discrimination, two times the amount of back pay, interest on the back pay, compensation
for any special damage sustained as a result of the discrimination, and, where appropriate
(except in the case of the District), punitive damages. In addition, the defendant shall be
required to pay litigation costs and reasonable attorneys fees, necessarily incurred. An
employee may bring an action in the Superior Court for the relief provided in this
subsection.
(d) An employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, harassed, denied promotion, or in
any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by his
or her employer, including the District of Columbia, because of participation in conduct
which directly or indirectly results in submission of a false claim being submitted to the
District shall be entitled to the remedies pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, only if
the following is true:
(1) The employee voluntarily disclosed all relevant information to a government or law
enforcement agency; and
(2) The employee had been harassed, threatened with termination or demotion, or
otherwise coerced by the employer or its management into engaging in the activity giving
rise to the false claim. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Law 2-85, § 816, 32 DCR 7396, as added May
8, 1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687; Apr. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-264, § 10(c),
46 DCR 2118.)

§ 2-308.17. Limitation of actions; burden of proof.

(a) A civil action brought pursuant to § 2-308.15 may not be filed more than 6 years after
the date on which the violation of § 2-308.14 is committed or more than 3 years after the
date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been
known by an official of the Office of Corporation Counsel, but in no event more than 9 years
after the date on which the violation is committed, whichever occurs last.
(b) A civil action brought pursuant to § 2-308.15 may not be brought for activity prior to
April 12, 1997.
(c) In any action brought pursuant to § 2-308.15, the District or the qui tam plaintiff shall
be required to prove all essential elements of the cause of action, including damages, by a
preponderance of the evidence.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a judgment of guilt in a criminal proceeding
charging false statements or fraud, upon a verdict after trial or upon a plea of guilty or nolo
contendere, shall estop the defendant from denying the essential elements of the offense in
any action brought pursuant to § 2-308.15 which involves the same transaction as in the
criminal proceeding. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Law 6-85, § 817, 32 DCR 7396, as added May 8,
1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687; Apr. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-264, § 10(d), 46
DCR 2118.)

§ 2-308.19. Civil investigative demands

(a)
(1) Whenever the Corporation Counsel has reason to believe that any person may be in
possession, custody, or control of any documentary material or information relevant to a
false claims law investigation, the Corporation Counsel may, in order to determine whether
to commence a civil proceeding pursuant to this chapter, issue in writing and cause to be
served upon such person a civil investigative demand requiring that such person do the
following:
(A) Produce documentary material relevant to the false claims law investigation for
inspection and copying;
(B) Answer in writing written interrogatories with respect to any documentary material or
information relevant to the false claims law investigation;
(C) Provide oral testimony concerning any documentary material or information relevant to
the false claims law investigation; or
(D) Furnish any combination of such material, answers, or testimony.
(2) The Corporation Counsel may delegate to the Principal Deputy Corporation Counsel the
authority, in his or her absence, to issue civil investigative demands pursuant to paragraph
(1) of this subsection. The Corporation Counsel may not issue a civil investigative demand
in order to conduct, or assist in the conducting of, a criminal investigation.
(b)
(1) Each civil investigative demand issued pursuant to subsection (a)(1) of this section shall
state the nature of the conduct constituting the alleged violation of a false claims law which
is under investigation, and the applicable provision of law alleged to have been violated.
(2) If such demand is for the production of documentary material, the demand shall do the
following:
(A) Describe each class of documentary material to be produced with such definiteness and
certainty as to permit such material to be fairly identified;
(B) Prescribe a return date for each such class that will provide a reasonable period of time
within which the material so demanded may be assembled and made available for
inspection and copying; and
(C) Identify the false claims law investigator to whom such material shall be made available.
(3) If such demand is for answers to written interrogatories, the demand shall do the
following:
(A) Set forth with specificity the written interrogatories to be answered;
(B) Prescribe dates at which time answers to written interrogatories shall be submitted; and
(C) Identify the false claims law investigator to whom such answers shall be submitted.
(4) If such demand is for the giving of oral testimony, the demand shall do the following:
(A) Prescribe the date, time, and place at which oral testimony shall commence;
(B) Identify a false claims law investigator who shall conduct the examination and the
custodian to whom the transcript of such examination shall be submitted;
(C) Specify that such attendance and testimony are necessary to conduct the investigation;
(D) Notify the person receiving the demand of the right to be accompanied by an attorney
and any other representative; and
(E) Describe the general purpose for which the demand is being issued and the general
nature of the testimony, including the primary areas of inquiry, which will be taken pursuant
to the demand.
(5) The date prescribed for the commencement of oral testimony pursuant to a civil
investigative demand shall be a date that is not less than 7 days after the date on which the
demand is received, unless the Corporation Counsel determines that exceptional
circumstances are present that warrant the commencement of such testimony within a
shorter period of time.
(6) The Corporation Counsel shall not authorize, pursuant to subsection (a)(1) of this
section, issuance of more than one civil investigative demand for oral testimony by the
same person unless the person requests otherwise or unless the Corporation Counsel, after
investigation, notifies that person in writing that an additional demand for oral testimony is
necessary.
(c) A civil investigative demand may not require the production of any documentary
material, the submission of any answers to written interrogatories, or the giving of any oral
testimony if such material, answers, or testimony would be protected from disclosure
under:
(1) The standards applicable to subpoenas or subpoenas duces tecum issued by a court of
the District of Columbia to aid in a grand jury investigation; or
(2) The standards applicable to discovery requests pursuant to the Superior Court Civil
Rules to the extent that the application of such standards to any such demand is
appropriate and consistent with the provisions and purposes of this section.
(d)
(1) Any civil investigative demand issued pursuant to subsection (a) of this section may be
served by a false claims law investigator or his or her agent, or by a United States marshal
or a deputy marshal, at any place within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of the United
States; provided, that the Superior Court of the District of Columbia could exercise
jurisdiction over the recipient of the demand consistent with the due process clause of the
Constitution of the United States.
(2) Any such demand or any petition filed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section may be
served upon any person who is not found within the territorial jurisdiction of any court of
the United States in such manner as the Superior Court Civil Rules prescribe for service in a
foreign country; provided, that the Superior Court of the District of Columbia could exercise
jurisdiction over the recipient of the demand consistent with the due process clause of the
Constitution of the United States.
(e)
(1) Service of any civil investigative demand issued pursuant to subsection (a) of this
section, or of any petition filed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, may be made
upon a partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity by the following methods:
(A) Delivering an executed copy of such demand or petition to any partner, executive
officer, managing agent, or general agent of the partnership, corporation, association, or
entity, or to any agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process on
behalf of such partnership, corporation, association, or entity;
(B) Delivering an executed copy of such demand or petition to the principal office or place of
business of the partnership, corporation, association, or entity; or
(C) Depositing an executed copy of such demand or petition in the United States mail by
registered or certified mail, with a return receipt requested, addressed to such partnership,
corporation, association, or entity at its principal office or place of business.
(2) Service of any such demand or petition may be made upon any natural person by the
following methods:
(A) Delivering an executed copy of such demand or petition to the person; or
(B) Depositing an executed copy of such demand or petition in the United States mail by
registered or certified mail, with a return receipt requested, addressed to the person at the
person’s residence or principal office or place of business.
(f) A verified return by the individual serving any civil investigative demand or any petition
filed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section setting forth the manner of such service shall
be proof of such service. In the case of service by registered or certified mail, such return
shall be accompanied by the return post office receipt of delivery of such demand.
(g)
(1) The production of documentary material in response to a civil investigative demand shall
be made under a sworn certificate, in such form as the demand designates, by the
following:
(A) In the case of a natural person, by the person to whom the demand is directed; or
(B) In the case of a person other than a natural person, by a person having knowledge of
the facts and circumstances relating to such production and authorized to act on behalf of
such person.
(2) The certificate shall state that all of the documentary material required by the demand
and in the possession, custody, or control of the person to whom the demand is directed
has been produced and made available to the false claims law investigator identified in the
demand.
(3) Any person upon whom any civil investigative demand for the production of
documentary material has been served shall make such material available for inspection and
copying to the false claims law investigator identified in such demand at the principal place
of business of such person, or at such other place as the false claims law investigator and
the person thereafter may agree and prescribe in writing, or as the court may direct
pursuant to subsection (j)(1) of this section. Such material shall be made so available on
the return date specified in such demand, or on such later date as the false claims law
investigator may prescribe in writing. Such person may, upon written agreement between
the person and the false claims law investigator, substitute copies for originals of all or any
part of such material.
(h)
(1) Each interrogatory in a civil investigative demand shall be answered separately and fully
in writing under oath and shall be submitted under a sworn certificate, in such form as the
demand designates, as follows:
(A) In the case of a natural person, by the person to whom the demand is directed, or
(B) In the case of a person other than a natural person, by the person or persons
responsible for answering each interrogatory.
(2) If any interrogatory is objected to, the reasons for the objection shall be stated in the
certificate instead of an answer. The certificate shall state that all information required by
the demand and in the possession, custody, control, or knowledge of the person to whom
the demand is directed has been submitted. To the extent that any information is not
furnished, the information shall be identified and reasons set forth with particularity
regarding the reasons why the information was not furnished.
(i)
(1) The examination of any person, pursuant to a civil investigative demand for oral
testimony, shall be conducted before an officer authorized to administer oaths and
affirmations by the laws of the United States or of the place where the examination is held.
The officer before whom the testimony is taken shall put the witness under oath or
affirmation and shall, personally or by someone acting under the direction of the officer and
in the officer’s presence, record the testimony of the witness. The testimony shall be taken
by any means authorized by, and in a manner consistent with, the Superior Court Civil
Rules, and shall be transcribed.
(2) The false claims law investigator conducting the examination shall exclude from the
place where the examination is held all persons except the person giving the testimony, the
attorney or other representative of the person giving the testimony, the attorney for the
District government, any person who may be agreed upon by the attorney for the District
government and the person giving the testimony, the officer before whom the testimony is
to be taken, and any stenographer taking such testimony.
(3) The oral testimony of any person taken pursuant to a civil investigative demand shall be
taken in the judicial district of the United States within which such person resides, is found,
or transacts business, or in such other place as may be agreed upon by the false claims law
investigator conducting the examination and such person.
(4) When the testimony is fully transcribed, the false claims law investigator or the officer
before whom the testimony is taken shall afford the witness, who may be accompanied by
an attorney, a reasonable opportunity to examine and read the transcript, unless such
examination and reading are waived by the witness. Any changes in form or substance that
the witness desires shall be entered and identified upon the transcript by the officer or the
false claims law investigator, with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for
making such changes. The transcript shall then be signed by the witness, unless the witness
in writing waives the signing, is ill, cannot be found, or refuses to sign. If the transcript is
not signed by the witness within 30 days after being afforded a reasonable opportunity to
examine it, the officer or the false claims law investigator shall sign it and state on the
record the fact of the waiver, illness, absence of the witness, or the refusal to sign, together
with the reasons, if any, given therefore.
(5) The officer before whom the testimony is taken shall certify on the transcript that the
witness was sworn by the officer and that the transcript is a true record of the testimony
given by the witness. The officer or false claims law investigator shall promptly deliver the
transcript, or send the transcript by registered or certified mail, to the custodian.
(6) Upon payment of reasonable charges therefore, the false claims law investigator shall
furnish a copy of the transcript to the witness only, except that the Corporation Counsel
may, for good cause, limit such witness to inspection of the official transcript of the
witness’s testimony.
(7) Any person compelled to appear for oral testimony pursuant to a civil investigative
demand may be accompanied, represented, and advised by an attorney. The attorney may
advise such person, in confidence, with respect to any question asked of such person. Such
person or attorney may object on the record to any question, in whole or in part, and shall
briefly state for the record the reason for the objection. An objection may be made,
received, and entered upon the record only when it is claimed that such person is entitled to
refuse to answer the question on the grounds of any constitutional or other legal right or
privilege, including the privilege against self-incrimination. Such person may not otherwise
object to or refuse to answer any question, and may not, directly or through the person’s
attorney, otherwise interrupt the oral examination. If such person refuses to answer any
question, a petition may be filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia pursuant
to subsection (d)(1) of this section for an order compelling such person to answer the
question.
(8) Any person appearing for oral testimony pursuant to a civil investigative demand shall
be entitled to the same fees and allowances that are paid to witnesses in the Superior Court
of the District of Columbia.
(j)
(1) The Corporation Counsel shall designate a false claims law investigator to serve as
custodian of documentary material, answers to interrogatories, and transcripts of oral
testimony received pursuant to this section, and shall designate such additional false claims
law investigators as the Corporation Counsel determines from time to time to be necessary
to serve as deputies to the custodian.
(2)
(A) A false claims law investigator who receives any documentary material, answers to
interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony pursuant to this section shall transmit them
to the custodian. The custodian shall take physical possession of such material, answers, or
transcripts and shall be responsible for the use made of them and for the return of
documentary material pursuant to paragraph (4) of this subsection.
(B) The custodian may cause the preparation of such copies of such documentary material,
answers to interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony as may be required for official
use by any false claims law investigator, or any other officer or employee of the Office of
the Corporation Counsel who is authorized for such use by the Corporation Counsel. Such
material, answers, and transcripts may be used by any authorized false claims law
investigator or other officer or employee in connection with the taking of oral testimony
pursuant to this section.
(C) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no documentary material, answers to
interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony, or copies thereof, while in the possession of
the custodian, shall be available for examination by any individual other than a false claims
law investigator or officer or employee of the Office of the Corporation Counsel authorized
pursuant to subparagraph (B) of this paragraph. The prohibition in the preceding sentence
on the availability of material, answers, or transcripts shall not apply if consent is given by
the person who produced such material, answers, or transcripts. Nothing in this
subparagraph is intended to prevent disclosure to the District of Columbia Council, including
any committee of the Council, to the United States Attorney’s Office, or to any other agency
of the United States for use by such agency in furtherance of its statutory responsibilities.
Disclosure of information to any agency other than the Council or the United States
Attorney’s Office shall be allowed only upon application, made by the Corporation Counsel to
the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, showing substantial need for the use of the
information by such agency in furtherance of its statutory responsibilities and after giving
the individuals who provided the information an opportunity to be heard on the release of
the information.
(D) While in the possession of the custodian and under such reasonable terms and
conditions as the Corporation Counsel shall prescribe, the following shall apply:
(i) Documentary material and answers to interrogatories shall be available for examination
by the person who produced such material or answers, or by a representative of that person
authorized by that person to examine such material and answers; and
(ii) Transcripts of oral testimony shall be available for examination by the person who
produced such testimony, or by a representative of that person authorized by that person to
examine such transcripts.
(3) Whenever any attorney of the Office of the Corporation Counsel is conducting any
official investigation or proceeding, the custodian of any documentary material, answers to
interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony received pursuant to this section may
deliver to such attorney such material, answers, or transcripts for official use in connection
with any such investigation or proceeding as such attorney determines to be required. Upon
the completion of any such investigation or proceeding, such attorney shall return to the
custodian any such material, answers, or transcripts so delivered that have not passed into
the control of any court or agency through introduction into the record of any case or
proceeding.
(4) If any documentary material has been produced by any person in the course of any false
claims law investigation pursuant to a civil investigative demand, and any case or
proceeding before a court arising out of such investigation, or any proceeding before any
District government agency involving such material, has been completed, or no case or
proceeding in which such material may be used has been commenced within a reasonable
time after completion of the examination and analysis of all documentary material and other
information assembled in the course of such investigation, the custodian shall, upon written
request of the person who produced such material, return to such person any such material
(other than copies furnished to the false claims law investigator pursuant to subsection
(g)(2) of this section or made for the Office of the Corporation Counsel pursuant to
paragraph (2)(B) of this subsection), which has not passed into the control of any court or
agency through introduction into the record of such case or proceeding.
(5)
(A) In the event of the death, disability, or separation from service in the Office of the
Corporation Counsel of the custodian of any documentary material, answers to
interrogatories, or transcripts of oral testimony produced pursuant to a civil investigative
demand issued pursuant to this section, or in the event of the official relief of such
custodian from responsibility for the custody and control of such material, answers, or
transcripts, the Corporation Counsel shall promptly do the following:
(i) Designate another false claims law investigator to serve as custodian of such material,
answers, or transcripts; and
(ii) Transmit in writing to the person who produced such material, answers, or testimony
notice of the identity and address of the successor so designated.
(B) Any person who is designated to be a successor pursuant to this paragraph shall have,
with regard to such material, answers, or transcripts, the same duties and responsibilities as
were imposed by this section upon that person’s predecessor in office, except that the
successor shall not be held responsible for any default or dereliction that occurred before
that designation.
(k)
(1) Whenever any person fails to comply with any civil investigative demand, or whenever
satisfactory copying or reproduction of any material requested in such demand cannot be
done and such person refuses to surrender such material, the Corporation Counsel may file
in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and serve upon such person a petition for
an order of such court for the enforcement of the civil investigative demand.
(2)
(A) Any person who receives a civil investigative demand may file in the Superior Court of
the District of Columbia and serve upon the false claims law investigator identified in such
demand a petition for an order of the court to modify or set aside such demand. Any
petition issued pursuant to this subparagraph must be filed:
(i) Within 20 days after the date of service of the civil investigative demand, or at any time
before the return date specified in the demand, whichever date is earlier; or
(ii) Within such longer period as may be prescribed in writing by any false claims law
investigator identified in the demand.
(B) The petition shall specify each ground upon which the petitioner relies in seeking relief
pursuant to subparagraph (A) of this paragraph, and may be based upon any failure of the
demand, or any particular portion thereof, to comply with the provisions of this section or
upon any constitutional or other legal right or privilege of such person. During the pendency
of the petition in the court, the court may stay, as it deems proper, the running of the time
allowed for compliance with the demand, in whole or in part, except that the person filing
the petition shall comply with any portions of the demand not sought to be modified or set
aside.
(3) At any time during which any custodian is in custody or control of any documentary
material or answers to interrogatories produced, or transcripts of oral testimony given, by
any person in compliance with any civil investigative demand, such person may file in the
Superior Court of the District of Columbia and serve upon such custodian, a petition for an
order of such court to require the performance by the custodian of any duty imposed upon
the custodian by this section.
(4) Whenever any petition is filed in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, such
court shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter so presented, and to enter
such order or orders as may be required to carry out the provisions of this section. Any final
order so entered shall be subject to appeal. Any disobedience of any final order entered
pursuant to this section by any court shall be punished as contempt of court.
(5) The Superior Court Civil Rules shall apply to any petition issued pursuant to this
subsection, to the extent that such rules are not inconsistent with the provisions of this
section.
(l) Any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony provided
pursuant to any civil investigative demand issued pursuant to subsection (a) of this section
shall be exempt from disclosure pursuant to subchapter 2 of Chapter 15 of this title.
(m) For purposes of this section, the term:
(1) “Custodian” means the custodian, or any deputy custodian, designated by the
Corporation Counsel pursuant to subsection (j)(1) of this section.
(2) “Documentary material” includes the original or any copy of any book, record, report,
memorandum, paper, communication, tabulation, chart, or other document, or data
compilations stored in or accessible through computer or other information retrieval
systems, together with instructions and all other materials necessary to use or interpret
such data compilations, and any product of discovery.
(3) “False claims law” means §§ 2-301.03 and 2-308.13 through 2-308.21.
(4) “False claims law investigation” means any inquiry conducted by any false claims law
investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person is or has been engaged in
any violation of a false claims law;
(5) “False claims law investigator” means any attorney or investigator employed by the
Office of the Corporation Counsel who is charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into
effect any false claims law, or any officer or employee of the District government acting
under the direction and supervision of such attorney or investigator in connection with a
false claims law investigation;
(6) “Person” means any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal
entity, including any state or political subdivision of a state. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Act 6-85,
§ 819, 32 DCR 7396, as added May 8, 1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687; Apr.
20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-264, § 10(e), 46 DCR 2118; Apr. 12, 2000, D.C. Law 13-91, § 122,
47 DCR 520.)

§ 2-308.20. Antifraud fund.

(a) There is hereby established an Antifraud Fund (“Fund”) to be operated as a proprietary
fund with assets not to exceed $2,000,000 at any time. The Fund shall consist of criminal
fines, civil penalties, and damages collected in cases brought pursuant to this chapter, other
than funds awarded to a cooperator or for restitution to a particular agency in the amount of
the actual loss to that agency. Such funds (with the exception of amounts for an award to a
cooperator or restitution to a program) shall be deposited in the Fund upon receipt. Monies
in the Fund shall not revert to the General Fund of the District of Columbia at the end of any
fiscal year, but shall remain available for the purposes set forth in this section, subject to
authorization and appropriation by Congress. Any balance in excess of that allowed the
Fund by this section shall be deposited in the General Fund of the District of Columbia.
(b) Amounts in the Fund shall be available for use by the Corporation Counsel to carry out
the enforcement of this chapter, including all costs reasonably related to prosecuting cases
and conducting investigations pursuant to this chapter.
(c) The Fund shall be audited annually by the Inspector General.
(d) It is intended that disbursements made from the Fund to the Office of Corporation
Counsel or other appropriate agency be used to supplement and not supplant the
Corporation Counsel’s appropriated operating budget. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Law 6-85, §
820, 32 DCR 7396, as added May 8, 1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687.)

§ 2-308.21. Penalties for false representations.

Whoever makes or presents to any officer or employee of the District of Columbia
government, or to any department or agency thereof, any claim upon or against the District
of Columbia, or any department or agency thereof, knowing such claim to be false,
fictitious, or fraudulent, shall be imprisoned not more than one year and assessed a fine of
not more than $100,000 for each violation of this chapter. The Corporation Counsel shall
prosecute violations of this section. (Feb. 21, 1986, D.C. Law 6-85, § 821, 32 DCR 7396, as
added May 8, 1998, D.C. Law 12-104, § 2(g), 45 DCR 1687.)

 

Comments are closed.